Description
At the center of the debate over complementary and alternative medicine -- from acupuncture and chiropractic treatments to homeopathy and nutritional supplements -- is how to scientifically measure the effectiveness of a particular treatment. Fourteen scholars from the fields of medicine, philosophy, sociology, and cultural and folklore studies examine that debate, and the clash between growing public support and the often hostile stance of clinicians and medical researchers.
Proponents and critics have different methodologies and standards of evidence -- raising the question of how much pluralism is acceptable in a medical context -- particularly in light of differing worldviews and the struggle to define medicine in the modern world. The contributors address both the methodological problems of assessment and the conflicting cultural perspectives at work in a patient's choice of treatment. Sympathetic to CAM, the contributors nonetheless offer careful critiques of its claims, and suggest a variety of ways it can be taken seriously, yet subject to careful scrutiny.
Tag This Book
This Book Has Been Tagged
Our Recommendation
Notify Me When The Price...
Log In to track this book on eReaderIQ.
Track These Authors
Log In to track Alfred I. Tauber on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track Asbjorn Hrobjartsson on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track Bonnie O’Connor on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track David B. Larson on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track David J. Hufford on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track Howard A. Brody on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track Kenneth F. Schaffner on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track Loretta M. Kopelman on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track Paul R. Wolpe on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track Stig Christian Brorson-Hansen on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track Susan S. Larson on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track Thomas E. Whitmarsh on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track Wayne B. Jonas on eReaderIQ.
Log In to track Daniel Callahan on eReaderIQ.
